On the Brink!

I feel like I’m very close to a breakthrough. Well, not really, but I’m finally getting used to inverted techniques on the BH side. During practice, my backhand loop is quite good, but in real matches, I have trouble with timing. It’s very hard to change from a very short pip stroke to a longer smooth stroke. Also, it requires quite a bit of footwork for me, because the window to pull off a good loop is VERY small for me at this point (I can’t seem to adjust at all). I’m also starting to play a little more aggressively over the table with the backhand (I try to think of ZJK when I play), and although it’s getting better, I still have a very long way to go. Basically, my backhand has become pure spin, and it’s hard for me to get good pace on the ball while keeping it on the table. The next step in my plan is to get more practice with serves. I seem to have a mental block (especially in doubles) when it comes to serving. Against an empty table, I can keep my serves short 95% of the time without a problem, but once I see an opponent on the other end, the percentage quickly drops to 50 or lower. It’s stupid, really, so I just have to get over it. Lastly, and very importantly, I have a problem with stroke recovery. Well, not exactly, but I can’t seem to prevent my grip from changing after a backhand stroke. I end up using a KLH grip, and my forehand gets all screwed up for the next shot.

Anyway, I think I’m currently in that slump that precedes a (hopefully) drastic improvement. Once everything clicks, I should be playing at a noticeably higher level than before. We shall see in the coming few months.

Continue reading

Rusty

Man, only two weeks off, and I can already feel the effects.  Played fairly poorly today, but being rusty was only half of it.  Apparently, my wrist bones (or tendons, or something else) couldn’t take the weight of the double smooth (or maybe it’s because I took such a long break), and started hurting after I tried to FH loop.  So, all day today, I had to try to avoid using my FH loop as much as possible.  If I had to loop, I would use a ton of body, very little arm, and hopefully no wrist at all.  Not surprisingly, I wasn’t able to play very well without my primary offensive shot!  However, it did force me to work on my blocking, and I really had to make my attacks count.  For whatever reason, my backhand didn’t hurt at all (even though I use a lot of wrist), so I tried working on my loop.  Very little success there.  I just don’t understand how to cover the ball.  The going forward motion is extremely difficult, and I always end up getting sidespin (hitting the back of the ball with my stroke following through sideways).  The footwork and timing to get the BH loop down are going to take practice.  Anyway, I’ve made a couple interesting observations.

First, Bryce Speed FX is AMAZING when glued up.  Unfortunately, I didn’t get to actually play with it while it was freshly glued, but when I glued it up a night or two ago, it was amazing!  The spin it produced was awesome, and it felt like the topsheet became more elastic.  However, without that glue effect, it’s very difficult for me to generate spin.  In fact, I think it’s too “advanced” of a rubber for me, since I haven’t developed a decent BH loop yet.  Although it’s good for flat hitting, I keep finding myself playing like it’s a short pip, except without as much control.  Not good!  That is why I decided to switch to Yasaka Pryde 40 on my backhand (just came in the mail).  I was supposed to get 2.0, but it came in max (not sure if that’s the fault of the one who ordered it or the shopkeeper), and I guess I’ll just go with that.  It does feel weird to have a thicker BH compared to FH, but it’s actually lighter than the 2.1 BSFX.  However, I think if I end up liking it, I’ll get 2.0 for sure next time.  That, or I’ll go back to the BSFX, if I feel like my BH has progressed to an adequate level.

So, the other interesting thing I’ve discovered is that the handle specifications for the TBS have changed since the older models!  I remember thinking it was a very thin handle when I tried it a long time ago, but when I got mine, it was slightly fatter than the MJ.  I thought maybe either my memory failed me, or my perception has changed over time, but today, I had a chance to hold two other people’s TBS (one FL and on AN).  Both of them felt very flat!  That is, the handle doesn’t bulge as much away from the blade face (more elliptical, less circular).  My friend thought it was because the handle is worn, but the other one (AN) was literally unused — just old.  Unless the AN handles have always been flatter (and my friend really has worn his blade to an extreme degree), I’m pretty sure they’ve updated the handle design.  That makes me glad I got a new blade, since this handle makes the balance feel better.  The old one reminds me of the Oh Sang Eun blade, and I thought the flatness of the handle was the biggest drawback of that blade.

In any case, that makes me wonder if more than the handle has changed.  I compared the blade composition (the ply structure at the handle base) of my TBS to my friend’s TB ALC, and I have to say, they’re virtually identical.  I’m convinced the ALC is just a rebranded TBS with a hollow handle.  However, just an updated handle shape (or hollowness) is enough to change the feel of a blade, so I can definitely see how people can feel the difference.  But I’m really glad I got this TBS.  I’m exhausted, so I’ll write more tomorrow night (if I’m up for it), after I test out the Pryde 40 BH!

Continue reading

Playing Positively

I believe it to be a consequence of never drilling when I first learned to play, but my natural reaction is to play balls passively.  That is, against incoming topspin, I have a very strong tendency to block.  I’m a little better with underspin, where I would either drop short (against shorter pushes), or actively push back against deeper pushes.  While I feel like it has helped me develop a good feel for incoming spin (as you have to read spin very accurately to play passive shots effectively), it’s usually not the best strategy unless you’re playing a self-destructive type that attacks every ball with fairly poor consistency.  To me, those little kids were always so amazing, being able to hit every ball that comes to them.  Well, really, that’s the point of doing drills, right?  I guess I really should’ve tried to do more when I was first developing, as I would’ve built some good habits.

Anyway, over this weekend, I had something of an epiphany.  Well, not really, but you know how many people seem to improve a huge amount, and then plateau for a long time?  I felt like I just reached a new level of enlightenment.  This is probably a byproduct of switching to the BW2, as passive shots are extremely difficult with such a spinny rubber.  Instead of blocking FH shots, I tried countering (I don’t know what the technical term for the stroke is, but it’s a very “forward” loop, pressing the ball down instead of lifting it up) on the rise.  I found that I was able to control my shots much better this way, which isn’t really a big surprise, as I’m able to “overpower” the incoming spin with my own.  Actually, I found that this is a great habit to get into for my BH as well.  The Spectol deals with topspin very well, and instead of trying to do a slow, passive block, using a more punching motion (while rolling over the ball to add some topspin) actually increases my consistency quite a bit.  Of course, with the backhand, I would like to use more spin variation, so I’m not going to attempt to attack every topspin ball the same way.  It really does seem like Spectol is built for countering topspin, rather than hitting through underspin.  Same with the BW2, really.  It counters topspin like a dream, and actually also lifts underspin balls rather easily.  I haven’t had a chance to deal with very heavy underspin (nobody around here can push that heavy, and there aren’t any choppers), but I wouldn’t be surprised if the BW2 handled that easily as well.  In any case, I think I’m on my way to becoming a better player!  Added one more shot to my arsenal.  I’m still missing many balls (either completely missing, or sometimes the ball “slips” off the rubber, which I believe has to do with my angle of contact), but after a few more practice sessions, I should be good!

By the way, the weight of the BW2 is becoming less of an issue for me on the forehand side.  My arm is starting to not really feel the extra weight.  However, I can’t say the same for the backhand.  Since I use a lot of wrist, all my backhand shots have been off, whether it’s blocking or hitting or whatever.  It really throws off my timing, and it changes the amount of feedback I get, as well (conservation of momentum, so heavier paddle results in less paddle movement).  My wrist movements are also noticeably slower, so it looks like I’ll be doing more “stiff wrist” shots (basically countering topspin), and less hitting or doing weird blocks.  Must train my wrist to bear the strain!  I’m really surprised at how much of a difference it makes.  I’m thinking the weight changed by at most 8 grams.  Actually, I just did a calculation based on some rubber mass measurements.  Assuming my blade face is 190 square centimeters, it comes out to about a 5.7 gram difference.  Isn’t it incredible how tuned the human body is that we can notice such a small change in mass?  Seriously, how does 5g feel in your hand?  Like you’re holding air.

Too Spinny

On Saturday, I played a couple of fun matches with this middle-aged guy.  He plays a very stable game, which is basically blocking everything off the bounce, and smacking the occasional high ball (whether topspin or underspin), and those usually go in.  Do you have an image of an old Chinese penholder in your head?  This guy plays very much like that, except he plays SH, with super powerful equipment (Amultart + T25).  He looks very awkward when he plays, but is actually a really good player, with solid basics (I’m guessing he would beat many players <1800 due to his consistency).  I’ve seen him play against other players before, and I thought he was going to cream me for two reasons.  First, he uses a tomahawk serve (I HATE those), and secondly, because he’s a great rally player, able to take all balls very early, thus keeping a lot of pressure on (not to mention his balls come back FAST due to that setup).

As I expected, the first two game, I lost (though, I wouldn’t say I got creamed, as the scores were all very close) because of his serve!  It’s really hard for me to read the topspin/underspin variation (this guy does it a lot better than many other players I’ve met), and because he can keep it short and low, it’s difficult to really attack the ball hard.  I ended up just trying to place it, but no matter where it went, if it popped up a little, he’d smack it.  That’s not to say placement isn’t important.  If I gave it to the middle of his forehand every time, he’d kill me every time.  But just by moving him around a little, I found his accuracy to go down considerably, because he always goes all out, so there’s a compromise of control and consistency.  Now, how did I end up winning?  His game had a fatal flaw, which I think is a result of playing around here.  Very spinny topspin balls are extremely hard to punch off the bounce, and using a super spinny rubber like Tenergy only compounds the problem.  I believe he hasn’t had a problem before because people here like to blast balls instead of spinning them.  Anyway, I just took my first chance at attacking any possible ball, not worrying too much about generating speed, and he wasn’t able to block anything back on the table.  I should point out that I was using the BW2, and it generates tenergy-level topspin (well, I’m not sure since I haven’t tried T05 on my blade).  Anyway, I was just thinking that although Tenergy seems like God’s rubber, maybe it’s not for everyone.  It’s not that this guy couldn’t “handle” it, necessarily, but I can’t help but think that a less spinny rubber (say, Bryce Speed) would suit his game much better.

That being said, let’s talk about BW2 a little bit, as the post title applies here, as well (but now in a good way).  As I’ve said, the BW2 creates some enormous topspin, and I found that it really shines a little farther from the table when compared to H3.  H3 is able to kill balls very easily when they’re really close, but quickly loses power as you step back (not so much an issue for the Neo sponges).  Because of BW2′s tendency to add crazy spin (paired with its super high throw), killing those close, low balls is a little more difficult (shots tend to arc, or if you really don’t add spin, just fly out too far).  Then again, maybe you don’t need to kill them, since you can add such heavy spin that people won’t really be able to respond aggressively.  However, stepping back and looping from mid distance is definitely NOT a weakness for the BW2.  The sponge is a little softer, which seems to make all the difference.  It’s so easy!  Not Tenergy easy, but I would say that it’s a very good balance of H3 and T05 (two of my favorite rubbers)!  Sadly, I’m still having difficulty generating spin on serves.  I feel like it doesn’t have the bite of H3 (due to not being tacky), and I’ll have to adjust my service strokes a little.  The hardest thing is keeping the underspin short.  Really have to work on that.  Oh, I’ve also found that chopping is surprisingly easy with it!  My chops are pretty dang spinny (so I think), and really quite controlled.  I’m not really planning on chopping, but I do it occasionally for fun, and it’s working out great.  I’ve adjusted to the short game surprisingly quickly.  Actually, it feels like it takes almost no adjustment, except to hold back a little.  With the H3, you can get a really fast push by, well, pushing really fast (duh), and you can achieve nearly the same result with the BW2 by simply slowing it down a little.  Going too fast will shoot the ball too far and too high.  Now, I’m just curious as to how long the tuning effect lasts.  I’ve heard 2-4 weeks, and then it’ll start playing very differently (much more dead feeling).  Honestly, this might be a good thing for me, but we’ll see!  So far, I’m loving this rubber!

Connection

Let me start by explaining the title of this post.  I read an article some time ago by a Chinese coach, talking about “connection” between shots.  Unfortunately, it seems I can’t find that article again, or else I would’ve quoted some excerpts from it.  It talked about some really interesting points — for example, after playing a power shot, if the ball comes back, the next ball “connects” better if it’s a spinnier, more control shot, rather than going for more and more aggression.  Usually we hear more of “don’t give up the initiative” and stuff like that, so most people I feel are trained to hit harder and harder.  I know I don’t, but that comes from laziness and lack of preparation, not because I think it’s the right strategy.

Another point made was that there are several types of offensive players, but there are two overhanging archetypes: the machine guns and the cannons.  I don’t think this requires much explanation — the machine guns use consistency and speed (as in, getting balls sooner), while the cannons pick balls to hit really hard.  The vast majority of female players (especially Asians) fall into the machine gun category, but in my opinion, Ma Long is definitely also a machine gun.  He hits balls hard, but not as hard as many other men, and excels at the quick counterlooping game, emphasizing recovery and stability.  Cannons would be like Ryu (where did he go?), Chen Qi,  and most “strategic” players, like Ma Lin and Schlager.  Naturally, most players are a cross of the two, with the traditional Chinese mentality leaning toward speed and taking balls off the bounce (machine gun), and European mentality closer to power from both wings off the table (cannons).  I think Timo is actually very close to the halfway point.  He definitely plays a European game, almost always looping from both wings, but he takes the ball earlier than most other European players, and I believe this is why he’s been able to dominate the European competition.  Recently, Michael Maze has also started staying closer and keeping on the pressure (mostly due to a huge improvement in his backhand — probably mostly a mentality thing).

Anyway, I ended up writing more about that than I first intended.  The initial reason for this post is that I saw a quick recording of one of my matches last night, and there is a severe lack of connection in my game.  It’s been a long time since I’ve seen a recording of myself, and now I remember why.  Very demoralizing.  But maybe I should start doing it more, since it’ll give me motivation to improve.  I’m not really a machine gun or a cannon… probably closer to a bow and arrow.  No power, no recovery, but I think my saving grace is that I’m at least accurate.  I was able to win many points (it was only a 2-minute clip) just by pushing.  But man, I can’t believe how bad I am.  Thank goodness I don’t have to watch myself play normally.

To end on a positive note, I think my backhand actually looks pretty good!  I was surprised, but it looks pretty natural, and probably better than my forehand (which is just embarrassing).  It does seem like a short pip backhand, so at least I’m not playing like it’s inverted.  Well, maybe I’ll see more of myself next week if I record some (or if my friends secretly record me, like they did yesterday)!

Edit: Oh man, you know the worst feeling?  It’s when you know exactly what your opponent is going to do, but there’s nothing you can do about it.  Totally outplayed.  He Zhi Wen seriously has found a winning strategy, as shown HERE.  Makes me want to go back to my P700.

Evolution

I was just watching some videos of the recent tournament of champions, and occurred to me that you can pretty much follow the (recent) evolution of table tennis by seeing how the Chinese players are changing.  I don’t really know how to say this, so I’ll just give some examples.

At the beginning of this past decade, and throughout most of it, the two dominant players in the world were Ma Lin and Wang Liqin.  Of course, they represent two very different styles, but still shared many similarities, and were both “perfect” in their own right.  Some similarities were a very forehand dominant game, and extremely good footwork to allow for that.  Ma Lin was (and  still is) very (very) good at serve/receive/third ball, was really strategic and tight with short game (lots of variation), and his stepping around is just incredible.  I think, as a penholder, it’s a necessity that he’s able to control the short game and get the first attack in, and penholders are very weak when having to defend.  What’s special about Ma Lin is that the first attack is often all he needs.  Wang Liqin was just an extremely good technical player (not to say he wasn’t weak strategically or anything), mainly due to his insane forehand.  Because he was able to return virtually every ball with power and precision, I think he played a less varied, and more stable game than Ma Lin.  In my eyes, no player today can do what he did in his prime (just a few years ago).

After those two, Wang Hao emerged, and until very recently, he was basically invincible (I don’t know what’s up with him lately, but it’s very disappointing).  Anyway, to me, he’s sort of an anomaly because of his RPB.  He was able to be very aggressive against almost everything (his BH flip was more like a loop over the table), and because of his BH strength, he rarely stepped around to use his FH.  The one thing I thought that was very “Chinese” about his style was that he was really good at keeping the pressure on.  He’d never get forced back very far, and was able to attack every ball, varying the angles, thus giving his opponents very little time to prepare for their shots.

More to the point now.  Just now, I was watching Ma Long, and I think he’s really what I would consider the “perfect” player today.  At first glance, he doesn’t have any unique strengths.  His forehand stroke is huge, but it doesn’t carry the same power as WLQ’s (in my opinion).  His backhand is stable, but he’s still noticeably forehand dominant.  Never does anything fancy, and rarely pulls off those “miracle” shots.  But somehow, he just never loses.  In the end, I think it’s just because of his stability.  That huge forehand loop can counter everything that comes at him, and he’s simply more consistent than any other player right now.  The biggest difference between him and WLQ (representing the older era) is that Ma Long isn’t afraid to use his backhand.  Although it doesn’t have the power or versatility of his forehand, he’s able to aggressively block everything (so having to use his backhand doesn’t result in a significantly weaker return), and he still has the power to kill the ball, whether it’s close up or from mid distance.  His transition from BH to FH is seamless, and his footwork is very good as well, allowing him to almost never be forced back.  It’s hard to compare to the older players, because their extreme footwork was a necessity for their styles.  Ma Long never jumps ridiculously far stepping over like Ma Lin.  On top of all that, his short game is very stable, too!  He doesn’t have any really tricky shots or anything (although he does do that thing where he looks like he’s going to push/drop, but instead flips it pretty dang hard), but he’s able to keep it short when he wants, or push it to the right places so that when his opponents open, he’s ready to counter with his forehand.  Seriously, I’m surprised he can lose any games given the way he plays now.

I think this move toward more balance between FH and BH is a necessity these days.  I’m not sure if it’s because the equipment is getting slower (glue ban), or if the players are just getting better and more athletic, but rallies are definitely longer now.  Players with an extreme forehand reliance probably can’t keep up simply because each point is longer, and their style is very physically taxing.  They say it’s a better spectator sport with longer rallies, but honestly, I think I preferred it when players were more rewarded for strategy, and less so for stability.  I mean, when you serve a perfect no spin, and they push it just long and high enough, the best decision should be to go all out and loop kill that thing!  Nowadays, they just give it 80% and worry more about their own recovery, because the ball has too high of a chance of coming back.  Longer rallies don’t necessarily result in more exciting matches, in my book.  But that, like everything else in this blog, is just my opinion.  The one good thing I can see from slowing down equipment (besides requiring more athleticism in players), is a potential revival of defensive players!  Joo has been doing really well after the glue ban, and hopefully more players will follow in his footsteps.  Man, if I could do a proper backhand chop, I would totally change to being a chopper.

On a final note, I’m very curious to see how long Xu Xin can last.  He has a relatively weak backhand (compared to the other top players today), and plays similarly to Ryu (footwork intensive, massive forehand).  He’s still young, so he can pull it off for now.  I can see Ma Long still owning everyone in five years, but I’m not so sure about Xu Xin.  It will be interesting to see what sorts of techniques he’ll acquire to offset his backhand weakness!

Pip Mentality

This time, I’m just going to ramble about some differences in mentality between playing pips and playing smooth.  More specifically, I’m trying to address some difficulties I’ve been having.

First of all, I think it’s safe to say that playing pips (effectively) is much more difficult than playing smooth.  This is a direct consequence of not being able to generate the same spin.  With smooth rubber, you can basically be anywhere, and hit any incoming ball with varying degrees of topin, and your ball will land back on the table.  Even if you slightly misread the spin, by generating tons of topspin, your ball will safely dip back down.  Well, in some cases, the same is often said about pips.  The lower sensitivity to spin makes it easier to return serves and control incoming spin.  However, I found the contrary to be true.  Although it’s probably true that you’d be less inclined to, say, eat an underspin serve, it’s much harder to return it well.  If the serve is high and/or long (but mostly just high), the pips do have the option of a flat hit, which is nice, and faster than a flip with inverted.  However, a good low serve necessitates a push return, which is much more difficult to do effectively with the less spinny pips.  There’s a much stronger emphasis on speed, placement, and most importantly, variation.  A strong push with inverted can often force a weaker (more spin-oriented) opening loop, but a strong push with pips is not nearly spinny enough, so you have to either drop it short (also harder, I found, due to the slipping effect), or make sure you push long and fast to some awkward place (elbow or really wide to the forehand usually).  Also, you’d think relatively dead serves would be great, since they’re smackable, but it’s actually very difficult to read the spin precisely on a barely-spinning ball.  And, of course, if you read it wrong, it floats.  So, usually against those types of serves, I do something like a roll (pushing is just asking to get killed), but again, placement is very important since it doesn’t have the speed or spin of a loop.

I’m not very good at staying on topic.  Let’s go back to topspin play.  I think I’ve mentioned this before, but the pips absolutely suck when you back off the table.  If I get pushed back, I start chopping, because hits are going to float and lose speed (if they even land), and fishing/lobbing has relatively little spin.  Well, no matter if I’m playing pips or smooth, my basic ball receiving strategy is the same: be prepared to use the backhand, but if possible, use the forehand.  The reason I think of it this way is because you have less time to react to balls coming to the backhand (since they’re all taken in front of the body), whereas you have a split second longer when taking balls with the forehand (that split second makes all the difference).  With the backhand pips, I have to be even more alert when using the backhand, because the balls really need to be taken at, or before the top of the bounce, especially with spinnier balls.  The thing I really like about pips is that you have several options when blocking (just look at Gao Jun), assuming you judge the incoming spin correctly.  There’s also the option of punching the ball (Wang Tao is the man).  However, just like with smooth, it’s increasingly difficult to return balls with increasing spin.  Using smooth rubber, it’s because the rubber will eat the spin, and pop the ball up (although you can just do that adding topspin block that rebounds surprisingly fast).  I’ve found that with pips, the problem is exactly opposite.  Against super spinny balls, the pips WON’T eat the spin enough, and the balls will float back, making it really hard to keep on the table.  I haven’t really had this problem yet since I came up here, but there’s nobody here with Mark-level spin.

Well, I got interrupted in the middle of writing this, so I lost track of where I was going to go with this.  So, in conclusion, playing a pip game is very different from playing smooth.  I think most people tend to think of pips as more of an easy way out — that is, thinking it’s easier to return serves, and easier to attack.  Of course, I would have to disagree with both of these statements.  There was a time where I thought the same thing.  Losing to pips players, I would feel like it’s cheap (because I wasn’t used to playing against it).  But now I know that with pips, you have more weaknesses, and have to work harder to cover them!  At least to me, playing pips is about adding variation to the game.  I definitely wouldn’t recommend pips to a very aggressive player.  Taking a look at the high level pips players (very few left in the men’s game), they tend to step around much more than double-inverted players, because it really is much easier to attack with smooth.  So why would I play pips?  It’s fun, and it’s different.

Oh, I guess I should talk about my own game lately.  I feel like I’ve been making some sort of progress.  At least, my backhand stroke and shot selection has become more “pure.”  When I just started out with the Clippa, I tended to still focus quite a bit on generating my own spin (since it was possible), and I used many inverted-like strokes.  The 802 is much less spinny, so I’ve learned to hit through spin more (instead of using my wrist to spin it), and focus on placement with pushes, instead of spin.  Pretty soon, I’ll be able to use something like Spectol, which is my ultimate goal, because it’s better for producing strange blocks.  Luckily, I’ve never really had a backhand loop, so I’ve been adjusting pretty fast!

(Not) Taking Risks

I was just thinking about the evolution of my game.  I think it might be interesting looking back to see how I got to where I am today.

Back in high school, I was introduced to the club, and there were only a few players.  Maybe 3 at about 800-900 level, and that was it (must be worlds apart from California).  My memory really sucks, but I do recall never really being taught to rally for warming up.  Pretty much, I just learned that you go over the ball for topspin, and under the ball for underspin.  Pretty good advice!  Back then I was playing with some premade paddle the club had.  For whatever reason, I started out playing penhold.  Probably because the SH backhand felt really awkward to me.  Man, I wish I had videos from back then to see how I played.  I’d probably cry watching them.  Then again, I’d probably cry watching videos of me NOW.  It’s funny seeing how early players are learning to loop now.  The beginners back at Berkeley are all learning to loop before they can hit properly.  I didn’t really learn to loop until after a couple years of playing, and even then it wasn’t my primary stroke.  Instead of looping, I would just push back underspin, and block back topspin.  I did (more or less) know how to loop by the time I got to Berkeley (I think I was about 900 level then).

At Berkeley, I learned to become much more forehand dominant (a necessity for penhold), and I think having my paddle stolen (sad!) and replacing it with the Taksim + H3 helped a lot.  Chinese rubber certainly allows for a more versatile offensive forehand.  Also started developing RPB, although I basically never used it (always just used 1.7 Sriver to keep weight low and control high).  During my college years, I started looping more and hitting less.  My RPB got a lot better when I got my MLC (still the best RPB blade I’ve ever used, with the Mark V AD).  It was also during college that my SH game started improving.  I learned how to hit backhands, for one.  This was basically due to me playing around more with it, and also due to teaching beginners.  Looping with SH has always been natural for me, as with hitting with PH.  Then, I started just attacking short balls more, and not really looping (I guess I got lazy or something).  I could usually control the short game pretty well, and then flip a higher ball pretty hard and accurately (it’s so easy with penhold forehand).

Anyway, during the last few months of my time at Berkeley, I decided to try pips penhold, since I got sick of looping everything.  Hitting was always more natural, anyway.  It’s really fun, and I like it a lot, but it seriously takes a lot of practice to play well.  With pips, you have to read the spin more carefully, and the timing has to be much more precise.  It’s great, though, because when you lose the ability to loop, you have to come up with more creative ways to win points.  More variation means more fun!

Well, currently, I’m playing SH with short pip BH because I’m too lazy (and don’t get enough quality practice) to use my awesome pips penhold.  For playing around, it’s definitely better to have smooth rubber on the forehand.  Still need to work on the pips BH though.  It’s getting better, but not pippy enough!

Anyway, I pretty much digressed right away.  The original point of this post was to determine why I end up beating people.  My forehand loop is spinny, but not particularly fast.  My backhand is extremely passive.  Let’s not even talk about my (lack of) footwork.  Honestly, I think it’s because I play extremely conservatively.  My consistency isn’t particularly good, but I’ve learned how to return balls with minimal risk.  Plus, since I never used to loop, my pushing game is pretty strong!  During games, I don’t really think about strategy much.  I try to push spinny as a general rule, to hopefully force a weak return.  Then I’d probably try to block it to some awkward place and make them run around.  But really, it’d be best if they just didn’t get their loop on the table.  Seriously, I probably just win because other people feel the need to take risks.  But I’m not really sure.

Man, I’m so tired, I don’t even know what I’m talking about anymore.

Learning

Had a pretty successful weekend of table tennis!  Yesterday, I practiced for a while against Radical.  Weird.  The ball that comes back on block is really hard to attack.  It’s slow and dead, which for whatever reason makes it hard to get a clean hit.  Also, it’s much harder to get a good grip on a dead ball.  It shouldn’t be a problem using the pips to smack, but I have a hard time hitting (instead of looping) on the forehand side.  Also played a few matches.  Some doubles first, which is surprisingly difficult when playing with people unaccustomed to doubles.  I guess it really takes some practice to get used to moving.  I thought I was bad, but I think I’m getting better.  Able to get back toward the table to attack, instead of running too far back to get out of the way.  Played a good game with a two-winged mid-distance looper.  Fun match.  I was trying to work on keeping the pressure on and not playing too defensively.  I also only used underspin serves the whole time, varying the spin.  It worked pretty well, I would say.  Realized that I REALLY need to work on hitting high balls.  Lastly, I played with a penhold blocker.  Unfortunately (for him), I’m well aware of penhold weaknesses (since they’ve always been my weaknesses)!  It was also unfair because he had a bad leg (which explains why he chose that style, I think).  Very spinny loops right into the corners are almost impossible to block with the traditional backhand.  Also, I must say that my accuracy has been exceptional this weekend.  For some reason, I’ve been hitting the white lines (on purpose).  I hope it’s a permanent change!

Some things I’ve noticed about my strokes lately.  Well, the first is nothing new: I need to use my knees more.  I think I’ve been having knee pain because I haven’t been bending them enough.  I guess I’ve gotten used to standing up straight for the most part, so my forehand is just fine, but I noticed that it was easier to hit balls with the backhand when I was a little closer to the table.  Still needs work, though.  Speaking of backhand hit, my stroke has been changing, and I’m not sure it’s for the better.  I think most people hit backhands with the paddle horizontal.  Mine is almost vertical, and I use a lot of wrist.  It’s a VERY small stroke, and I can’t get that much power on it.  Guess I need to watch more videos of Wang Tao.

So, today I played with a beginner, and he’s one of the coolest guys I’ve met at the club.  I think he would be any coach’s dream student.  Very eager to learn, asks a lot of questions, always listens to what you have to say, and completely open to any sort of suggestions.  I’m pretty sure he’s played for a while (just for fun), but was just recently introduced to real table tennis.  Definitely had some bad habits to get rid of, but had fairly good control and feel for the ball.  He’s not that young, either.  Probably in his 30s.  But he was really grateful that I took the time to hit with him and give him some pointers, and really, I was glad to have the chance, too.  You rarely find people who are that into learning table tennis.  Last week, I hit with another beginner, but he wasn’t nearly as cool.  He obviously needed help, but was too stubborn to really listen to advice, and seemed pissed when he wasn’t playing well.  In his head, he’s probably a better player than in reality.  On the other hand, the guy today was very humble, knew he was a beginner, and was just glad to have someone to hit with and learn from.  And actually, he was quite good at keeping the ball on the table, and was also a fast learner.  Maybe I’ll hit with him some more next week and see how fast he improves!  My guess is that, at this rate, he’ll be at least 1200 in a year.

I would like to think I was the same way when I was learning.  Well, not exactly the same.  He definitely is better at attacking than I was (I learned to block and play short game first, which is probably why short game is my strength even now), but I was always really happy to have someone to hit with (there really aren’t many players in Oregon, and even fewer back then).  I also liked learning the theory behind everything.  Thinking about WHY things work really helps when you don’t have a coach around, telling you what you’re doing right or wrong.  There’s a huge difference between getting mad at everything not working (like the other n00b) and realizing what you’re doing wrong, but acknowledging that it’s hard to learn.  Once you know what to work on, it’s just a matter of doing it.

Anyway, I just really like seeing people interested in table tennis, and that guy’s attitude really impressed me.  I probably have some other things to write about, but I guess I’ll space it out over the week, so I have something to do when I’m bored.

Double the fun

Played around a lot today, just trying to work on my consistency. Learned a couple things. First, the MJ is not a chopping blade. Instead of being able to load up the spin on chops, I found myself too scared to put much force into it. Very low dwell time (compared to other blades I’ve used) plus hard wood makes chopping very difficult. Secondly, and more importantly, my attack pattern has become way too predictable! Actually, that’s not really the problem. It’s more like, I miss shots I should make, just because I always try to aim at the same spot.

Basically, for some reason, I ALWAYS attack down the line. With the backhand, I think it’s just a lifelong (or ping pong career long) habit of blocking down the line. Against opponents who would step around and loop a long serve/push to the backhand, a punch down the line could win the point right there. Or, at the very least, it would make their second attack more likely to go to the forehand, which I was much more comfortable using. With shakehand, for whatever reason (most likely a problem with my wrist angle), my balls tend to go down the line, and it’s much easier for me to hit that way with the pips. As for the forehand… I’m really not sure. I know I learned to flip short balls down the line just because it usually wouldn’t be looped back hard that way, and so I had time to recover (step back out). Now that I’m looping, I don’t even know. It’s unnatural, having to turn your wrist outward, and it’s also harder to add power. Anyway, although it tends to be very effective against players unfamiliar with me (they tend to believe I’m always going cross court… strange), it also drops my consistency on the forehand side, as it’s a more awkward shot and has less room to land. For example, I played a game of doubles today, and when I was countering the opponent’s loops (played against a pair of mid-distance loopers), trying to go down the line caused me to be unable to keep the ball down, and many balls went long. On the plus side, the ones that landed always won the point! I’m not really sure what the technical term is called for the shot I was talking about. Basically, they loop (usually from a meter or so away from the table), and I pretty much just try to loop it immediately off the bounce. Well, whatever, it was very effective!

Anyway, I think my doubles game is improving!  As usual, I think I tend to be better at doubles.  I’m pretty terrible when rallies start, and I’d rather attack balls hard very early on.  I was able to control the distance of my serves pretty well (they stayed short when I wanted them to, and went pretty deep when I wanted them long), and kept them low/spinny enough to not be attack.  More importantly, I’ve somehow managed to stay closer to the table.  Maybe it was because my partner was a tiny old man who didn’t need much space.  In any case, staying relatively close to the table worked wonders!  It might’ve also been because my opponents rarely hit blazing fast balls, so I was able to do that loop countering shot I was talking about on most of them.  Plus, the pips don’t fare well once you get away, and by staying close I was able to do some really nice pippy blocks.  Love the pips.  Now I really want to play some doubles at the next tournament.  Western Open, hopefully.  Who wants to be my partner?

P.S.  I think I know why this sheet of H3 looks so much better than all my previous ones.  So since I stupidly took out the insert thing in my paddle case, the blades have a lot more room to move around.  It turns out, the plastic protection sheet thing starts to peel off as the blade moves around in there, so my edges will start looking crappier than the center.  Well, I noticed this early on, so I’ve had a habit of clamping my blade between two textbooks at home when I don’t play.  It’s been working wonders!

P.P.S.  Why do I keep forgetting to write about things during my first post?  I always have to add a P.S.